<?xml version="1.0" encoding="iso-8859-1"?>
<!-- generator="FeedCreator 1.7.2" -->
<rss version="2.0">
	<channel>
		<title>Joomla! powered Site</title>
		<description>Joomla! site syndication</description>
		<link>http://uiso.org</link>
		<lastBuildDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 17:44:30 +0100</lastBuildDate>
		<generator>FeedCreator 1.7.2</generator>
		
		<item>
			<title>Rep. Cole touts Native American 'renaissance'</title>
			<link>http://uiso.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=25&amp;Itemid=27</link>
			<description>IndianZ.comWednesday, November 7, 2007As the only Native  American in Congress, Rep. Tom Cole (R-Oklahoma) is constantly educating his  colleagues about tribes and Indian policy. Cole, a member of the  Chickasaw Nation of Oklahoma, likes to tell fellow members that they swore to  uphold tribal sovereignty when they took their oath of office. The U.S.  Constitution recognizes tribes in the same clause as states and foreign nations.   A tribe is not a genealogical association and it&amp;#39;s not a fraternal  society,  Cole said yesterday in a speech at the Library of Congress in  Washington, D.C.  It&amp;#39;s a living, breathing entity that exists organically and  its purpose is to improve the lives and protect the identity of its members.   But Cole, whose family has been active in politics for generations, said  lawmakers of both parties don&amp;#39;t always respect tribal sovereignty. Republicans  are almost always concerned about gaming while Democrats try to extend federal  oversight of tribes, mainly through labor unions, he said. Both issues  have been heavily debated during Cole&amp;#39;s time in Congress. Just this year, he  broke with his party to support to federal recognition bills -- one for Native  Hawaiians and another for six Virginia tribes. In the past, he has co-sponsored  bills to shield tribes from federal labor laws. Despite the challenges,  Cole said American Indians and Alaska Natives today are undergoing a cultural  and political  renaissance.   It&amp;#39;s an extraordinary time that we&amp;#39;re living  through right now,  he told the well-attended forum. Even that can pose  problems for Indian Country. When tribes are at their strongest, the federal  government often steps in to do damage, he said.  My own tribe teaches  me that times of great opportunity are times of great danger,  he said,  recalling the forced removal of tribes during the 1830s.  They didn&amp;#39;t  send us from Mississippi to Oklahoma because we were doing badly,  Cole  continued.  They sent us to Oklahoma because we were doing well. There was a lot  of jealousy surrounding us.  With Indian gaming a $25 billion industry  and tribes expanding their economic horizons, these are  prosperous times,  Cole  said. Yet that doesn&amp;#39;t always generate support from the American public, Cole  warned.  A lot of people like poor Indians,  he said. Besides  having the distinction of being the only Native American in Congress, Cole  chairs the National Republican Congressional Committee, whose goal is to  increase the number of Republicans in Congress. His efforts didn&amp;#39;t go so well  last year, as Democrats took over the House in addition to the Senate.  Cole also serves as one of five Republican vice chairs of the  Congressional Native American Caucus, a bipartisan group of lawmakers that  advocates for Indian legislation. The caucus has more than 100 members.  Cole represents Oklahoma&amp;#39;s 4th Congressional district. His constituents  include a number of tribes in the southwest region of Oklahoma.  Yesterday&amp;#39;s speech was the keynote for Native American Heritage Month at  the Library of Congress. A number of other events are being held throughout the  month. Relevant Links:  Rep. Tom Cole - http://www.house.gov/cole (http://www.house.gov/cole/)   Native American Heritage Month, Library of Congress - http://www.loc.gov/topics/nativeamericans (http://www.loc.gov/topics/nativeamericans/)  Copyright &amp;copy; Indianz.Com   [In  accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed  without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in  receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes  only.]</description>
			<category>United States - Oklahoma</category>
			<pubDate>Wed, 07 Nov 2007 20:57:46 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>McElhenie: Andrew and the Indians</title>
			<link>http://uiso.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=23&amp;Itemid=2</link>
			<description>Posted: November 01, 2007by: Teresa McElhenieI have a friend  who tells me to write of my pain. My friend is a storyteller, an Indian. To  people of the white race, a storyteller is just a person who tells stories. To  an Indian, a storyteller is a special person, revered by the clan. They hold the  past in their heads, and the gift of seeing unseen things. My mother was  born on what is today known as the Poarch Creek Indian Reservation outside of  Atmore, Ala. My mother never talked about being an Indian. It was ingrained into  her as a child not to let that be known. &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Hide your heritage.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Her home was  not a reservation when she was born there. The U.S. government said she  didn&amp;#39;t exist as an Indian. Why did she not exist as an Indian? Because  Andrew Jackson, one of the heroes in every child&amp;#39;s history book, said she did  not exist as an Indian. That hero, who killed a thousand of my people in only  one day at Horseshoe Bend, made this decision. This man, this president, said  the American Indian did not deserve to be treated as a human. He stated that  they should be herded like sheep or cows and put into pens. My mother&amp;#39;s  ancestors did not understand his reasoning, and hid out in the dense forest of  southern Alabama to escape this indignity. As a consequence, they later suffered  the indignity of being denied their heritage, their birthright, and their right  to exist as an Indian because they were not listed on the &amp;#39;&amp;#39;proper&amp;#39;&amp;#39; roles.  My mother was made to feel small in school because she knew that she was  a &amp;#39;&amp;#39;dirty&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Indian. She learned to deny being what she was. She learned to  &amp;#39;&amp;#39;pass.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; When I was a child, she whispered to me that she was an Indian.  &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Shh,&amp;#39;&amp;#39; she hummed in my ear, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;don&amp;#39;t tell anyone. It&amp;#39;s our secret.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Suddenly,  I realized why, during games of Cowboys and Indians, I always wanted to be the  Indian, even though it meant I had to be the one who died. We all watched Tom  Mix, Roy Rogers, the Lone Ranger and other cowboy heroes. The cowboy was always  the good guy wearing the white hat. The Indians were always the stinking  coyotes, sneaking up on people and doing dirty deeds to poor, unsuspecting white  settlers who were just minding their own business. Here comes Hopalong Cassidy,  and he saves the day. Bang, bang! &amp;#39;&amp;#39;You&amp;#39;re dead, you dirty Injun.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Still, it  didn&amp;#39;t feel right to me to play the cowboy, or even Annie Oakley. My  mother was never allowed to be proud of her heritage, not only as a child, but  for most of her adult life. I have an older brother who was born in Alabama. His  birth certificate states his race is Indian. I was born later, after my mother  moved to Louisiana. No one knew she was Indian. It was easy enough to &amp;#39;&amp;#39;pass&amp;#39;&amp;#39;  in Louisiana with so many dark-skinned people there. My birth certificate even  denies me my heritage. I am white. My birth certificate says so. Time  moves forward. Views change. Things once hidden are released to the liberal  sunlight of acceptance. Your sins will find you out. Genocide, that horrible  word associated with Hitler, never happened here in our wonderful land of the  free. But it did. Ask the Creek, the Choctaw, the Cherokee and the other two  &amp;#39;&amp;#39;civilized&amp;#39;&amp;#39; tribes who adopted the ways of the white man only to be betrayed  and murdered by their mentors. Long before the &amp;#39;&amp;#39;death march&amp;#39;&amp;#39; of Bataan, there  was the &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Trail of Tears.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; The white man does not understand how I feel  about the attempted genocide of my peoples. When I say my peoples, I am not just  speaking of my mother&amp;#39;s Creeks; I am speaking of the Cherokee, Choctaw,  Seminole, Comanche, Apache, Ute - every tribe that suffered the same  indignities. Here in the home of the brave and the land of the free, we were not  allowed to be brave or free. This country, founded on religious freedom, took  away our most sacred ceremonies and declared them illegal. Yet, they say it  happened a long time ago; and &amp;#39;&amp;#39;get over it. You can&amp;#39;t expect us to keep making  it up to you.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; I feel unsettled when I hear these things. Why is that? They  didn&amp;#39;t do those things to me personally, and they cannot understand why it  affects me. Why do I feel this pain? I have no real answers, but the pain is  there. It is real. It hurts. I recently stood on the steps of the  Riverwalk in New Orleans - a beautiful place with lots of ambience. Across the  distance there was a bronze statue of a man riding a horse. This man must be a  wonderful person for them to raise a statue in his honor, to name a section of  the city after him. This man was Andrew Jackson. I stood in Jackson  Square. By my side was my friend, the storyteller. When I looked at him, I saw  the same pain written on his face that was on mine. We did not need to speak.  Each knew what the other felt. Teresa McElhenie, Muscogee  Nation of Florida, resides in Spring, Texas. Her mother is Muscogee Creek from  Atmore, Ala. &amp;copy; 1998 - 2007 Indian  Country Today [In  accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed  without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in  receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes  only.]</description>
			<category>News - Latest</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:27:47 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Despite it all, 'we know we exist'</title>
			<link>http://uiso.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=22&amp;Itemid=27</link>
			<description>The region&amp;#39;s tribes still preserve their culture, memories and  hopesBy ALAN J. McCOMBS, The News JournalNov. 2,  2007John Norwood remembers being told in elementary school that  he did not exist. When I was young and in school, the standard thought  [was] Indians were gone and not here,  said Norwood, 43, a member of the  Nanticoke Lenni Lenape tribe in southern New Jersey, which traces its ancestry  to Delaware&amp;#39;s Nanticoke and Lenape tribes.  It left me feeling quite  delegitimized and wondering if it were something that I could actually  claim. Today, schools might be better informed, but ignorance still is  prevalent about the thousands of people of Nanticoke and Lenape descent now  living in the region, Norwood said. He and others are working to write the  history of the region&amp;#39;s indigenous people.In October, Norwood, of  Moorestown, N.J., released a 51-page document about the related indigenous  tribes known as the Nanticoke and Lenape people in Delaware, and the Nanticoke  Lenni Lenape in southern New Jersey. Norwood said the online report,  We Are  Still Here,  will form the basis for a book he intends to publish by early next  year, alongside a new biography of Chief Marion  Strong Medicine  Gould of the  Lenape people of Delaware.For American Indians, that history has never  been dead or lost, Norwood said. It was something you talked about  quietly with members of the family,  he said.  You didn&amp;#39;t spend much time  proclaiming [it] because of fear of persecution. At powwows and other  community events, that history was discussed more freely. At the Nanticoke  Indian Museum in Millsboro, housed in what was formerly a segregated schoolhouse  for American Indian children, that history stands on display for  visitors.Certainly, there is a deep and twisting history of American  Indians in the region. When European explorers came to Delaware and New Jersey  in the late 15th and early 16th centuries, they remarked that the region was  heavily populated.When the Swedes and the Dutch built permanent outposts  in the region in the 1600s, relations between the Europeans and the natives  ranged from cordial to outright hostile. By the 1700s, disease, discrimination  and conflict with the European settlers forced many Nanticoke and Lenape people  to leave. A lot of our people are not in Delaware,  said Assistant Chief  of the Nanticoke Larry Jackson, 49, of Milton..  Many moved up into Canada [and]  the Ohio area. Today, the Nanticoke population in Delaware numbers about  1,000, while Chief Dennis Coker of the Lenape people counts about 700 to 800  members.Some of those who remained in Delaware and southern New Jersey,  Norwood said, found themselves in a society in which prejudice refused to  acknowledge their presence in the region&amp;#39;s history.  I remember my aunts when I  was young saying don&amp;#39;t ever forget who you are,  Norwood said,  but they would  say it in hushed tones. Both the Delaware and New Jersey state  governments have acknowledged the region&amp;#39;s enduring American Indian population.  Since the 1980s, New Jersey has officially recognized the Nanticoke Lenni Lenape  people and, in 1903, the Delaware Legislature recognized the Nanticoke  people.However, Delaware does not officially recognize the Lenape people  as an American Indian tribe. The Lenapes&amp;#39; last effort to gain official status  fell apart in 1993, in part out of concern that the group would build casinos,  Coker said. It was really an emotional blow to our community to have, in  essence, our state not recognize us,  Coker said.None of the American  Indians in Delaware and in southern New Jersey are recognized by the federal  government, a fact that all three groups say they want to change. Receiving  federal recognition is a more tedious and lengthy process than being recognized  by state governments, they say. The federal government is making it more  and more difficult to becoming federally recognized,  Coker said.On  paper, receiving federal recognition looks like a two-year process, said Federal  Office of Indian Affairs spokesperson Gary Garrison. The government requires  groups petitioning for federal recognition to fill out multiple forms proving  the continuous existence of the community dating back to at least 1900, as well  as other forms detailing the governance of the group, he said. Gathering proof  of a group&amp;#39;s existence can often extend the process for decades, Garrison  said. They&amp;#39;re just getting around to making decisions on ones that were  submitted in 1980,  Garrison said.With a process that lengthy, area  tribes say they can wait on getting federal recognition. It&amp;#39;s something  that would be nice to have, but we definitely don&amp;#39;t have to have it,  Coker  said.  We know we exist.  We have always been here and we will always be  here. Copyright &amp;copy; 2007, The News Journal.http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071102/LIFE/711020308/1005/LIFE (http://www.delawareonline.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20071102/LIFE/711020308/1005/LIFE)  [In  accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed  without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in  receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes  only.]</description>
			<category>United States - Delaware</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 21:23:34 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Newcomb: California, Florida linked by organic laws</title>
			<link>http://uiso.org/index.php?option=com_content&amp;task=view&amp;id=17&amp;Itemid=2</link>
			<description>Posted: October 25, 2007by: Steven Newcomb / Indigenous Law  InstituteIn 1877, the U.S. government printing office published  the book &amp;#39;&amp;#39;The Federal and State Constitutions, Colonial Charters, and other  Organic Laws of the United States.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Ben Poole, who was then clerk of printing  records, compiled the documentation under an order of the U.S. Senate.  Organic laws or fundamental laws form the foundation of a government.  Thus, documents such as early colonial charters, the state constitutions and the  U.S. Constitution are considered the organic law for the respective states and  the United States. The 1787 Northwest Ordinance, for example, is the fundamental  organic law for the territories of the United States and lays down the  procedures for making the transition from a territory to statehood, details not  provided by the federal Constitution. Each territorial act and organic act  passed by Congress constitutes part of the fundamental organic laws of the  United States. Organic laws provide the framework, patterns of ideas and  guidelines necessary for the regularized functioning of a particular  governmental system. Fundamental organic laws also rest upon and embody the  values of a system of government, such as the United States and the individual  states. The 1877 book is highly illuminating. It provides an unusual  look at the basis for the territories and states of the United States, as well  as a significant part of the basis for the relationship between the United  States and Indian nations and peoples. Oddly enough, the organic law of  the state of Florida begins with the Royal Prerogatives given to Columbus by the  king and queen of Spain. The prerogatives read in part: &amp;#39;&amp;#39;For as much as you  Christopher Columbus, are going by our command, with some of our vessels and  men, to discover and subdue some Islands and Continent in the ocean, and it is  hoped that by God&amp;#39;s assistance, some of the said Islands and Continent in the  ocean will be discovered and conquered by your means and conduct, therefore it  is but just and reasonable, that since you expose yourself to such danger to  serves us, you should be rewarded for it&amp;#39;&amp;#39; (emphasis added). Such  language tells us that the fundamental law of Florida is grounded in the  European desire to invade, conquer and subdue indigenous peoples and to take  their lands. A deeper look reveals that this desire was also cloaked in  religious terms. Thus, an editor&amp;#39;s note linked to the heading &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Florida&amp;#39;&amp;#39; reads:  &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Spain claimed and exercised the right of ultimate dominion over her  possessions in America on the rights given by the discovery under this  commission, and the grant of Pope Alexander [VI].&amp;#39;&amp;#39; The concept of &amp;#39;&amp;#39;dominion&amp;#39;&amp;#39;  is rooted in conceptions and behaviors of domination. In keeping with  the editor&amp;#39;s note, the next document listed as part of the organic law of  Florida is the &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Bull of Pope Alexander [VI] Conceding America to Spain.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; The  Vatican document of May 4, 1493, the bull Inter Caetera, is reprinted in its  original Latin text, including that part of the document by which the pope  called for &amp;#39;&amp;#39;barbarous nations&amp;#39;&amp;#39; to be &amp;#39;&amp;#39;subjugated,&amp;#39;&amp;#39; and &amp;#39;&amp;#39;reduced&amp;#39;&amp;#39; to the  &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Catholic faith and Christian religion.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Listed next are two other documents,  a 1795 treaty between Spain and the United States, and an 1819 U.S. treaty with  Spain ceding Florida to the United States. The organic law of California  is also quite fascinating. It is partly explained by a note accompanying the  heading &amp;#39;&amp;#39;California.&amp;#39;&amp;#39; The note reads: &amp;#39;&amp;#39;California was first discovered by the  Spaniards in 1542, and they began to establish missions there in 1769. After the  Mexican revolution, in 1924, it [California] formed a province of that republic  until 1846, when the inhabitants and emigrants from the United States  established an independent government. The treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo brought  it [California] within the limits of the United States ...&amp;#39;&amp;#39; Thus, in  the 1877 book published under order of the U.S. Senate, the states of Florida  and California are linked by the fact that both states are historically traced  to the Royal Prerogatives issued to Columbus (Cristobal Colon) and to the Inter  Caetera papal bull of 1493. This connection between the state of California, the  Royal Prerogatives of Columbus and the Vatican papal bull is found in the  editor&amp;#39;s comment that &amp;#39;&amp;#39;California was first discovered by Spaniards in 1542.&amp;#39;&amp;#39;  However, the connection seems slightly less obvious in the case of California  only because of Mexico&amp;#39;s successful revolution against Spain. As a result of  Mexico&amp;#39;s victory, the treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo was made between the United  States and Mexico rather than between the United States and Spain. Based  on the information found in the 1877 book, other states that are also  historically linked to the Royal Prerogatives of Columbus and the papal bull of  1493 include Utah, Arizona, New Mexico, Texas and a significant portion of  Colorado. The abovementioned organic law documents are made sense of in  the context of the Europeans&amp;#39; desire to subjugate, subdue and conquer the  original indigenous peoples of the hemisphere, and the desire to monetarily  benefit from their lands and resources. The Spanish Catholic missions  established in Baja and Alta California were also designed to carry out this  intention to conquer and subdue indigenous peoples and their lands. To  acknowledge that certain fundamental laws form the foundation of a given society  is to acknowledge the kinds of ideas, cultural values, knowledge and social  practices that form the permanent basis upon which a social order has been  built. The concepts of empire, domination, subjugation and conquest found in the  Royal Prerogatives issued to Columbus and in the Inter Caetera papal bull of  1493 tell us something about the kinds of ideas that have become a hidden part  of the fabric of the United States, and why our respective Indian nations and  peoples have suffered the trauma of genocide and severe losses at the hands of  the society of the United States. This legacy also constitutes an integral part  of the fundamental and organic laws of the United States.  Steven Newcomb, Shawnee/Lenape, is the indigenous law research  coordinator at Kumeyaay Community College and the Sycuan Education Department of  the Sycuan Band of the Kumeyaay Nation, co-founder and co-director of the  Indigenous Law Institute, and a columnist for Indian Country Today.  &amp;copy; 1998 - 2007 Indian Country  Today[In  accordance with Title 17 U.S.C. section 107, this material is distributed  without profit or payment to those who have expressed a prior interest in  receiving this information for non-profit research and educational purposes  only.]</description>
			<category>News - Latest</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 26 Oct 2007 20:12:03 +0100</pubDate>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
